Legal Opinion

State v. Bradford

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1978No. Nos. 77-1355 and 77-1384PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Although Am. Sub. H. B. No. 300 provides that one serving a sentence shall be released if there is no substantially equivalent offense on the effective date specified in the act and any person serving a sentence of imprisonment for an offense that remains an offense after the effective date of the act but which would entail a lesser penalty shall have his existing sentence modified in conformity with the penalties provided by this act, it is clear that only vacation or modification of sentence is contemplated and that formal resentencing with the prisoner present is not contemplated or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Maynard v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Maynard v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API