Legal Opinion

Perlov v. Loric Holding Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1948PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, J.

Plaintiff-tenant moves for an injunction pendente lite in aid of his suit for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant-landlord from interfering with his asserted right to maintain a television aerial on the roof of a multiple dwelling apartment house, and for a judgment declaratory of his rights.

Irrespective of the merits of the controversy and the rights of the parties as they ultimately may be determined, it appears without dispute that the aerial already has been removed. Under the circumstances, the temporary relief sought would be futile. Equity will not do a vain thing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Prentiss v. . BowdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Gueutal v. GueutalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. Bauer v. SchwartzNew York Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Schmidt v. Louis, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kanon v. Hefgold Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Perlov v. Loric Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Tanenbaum v. UngerNew York Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API