Legal Opinion

Paulson v. Hyland

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 1, 1943No. 4691PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenRoot, Judge

This i-s an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United-States -Patent Office in an-interference proceeding No. 73,561, .affirming a decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention to the party Hyland with respect to all of the counts in issue, five in number.

The interference is between two applications of Hyland, one filed ■on October 8, 1928, and the other July 1, 1929, and an application •of Paulson filed on July 15,1929.

Paulson is the junior party and the burden was upon him to ■establish priority by a preponderance of evidence. It appears that…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Magnaflux Corporation v. Sonoflux CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  4. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API