Legal Opinion

Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1984No. 82-3312, 82-3379PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.

These consolidated petitions by Kentucky Utilities Co. (KU) and the Kentucky Railroad Commission (KRC) seek a review of a decision of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) which set aside an Order by the KRC as to the maximum rate allowable for intrastate coal shipments by the Louisville & Nashville Railroad (L & N). At issue is a comparatively recent section of the Interstate Commerce Act, known as the Staggers Act, 49 U.S.C. § 11501(c), which permits the ICC to set aside a state rate-making decision effecting intrastate rail traffic if the state regulatory body…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. North Carolina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  4. San Antonio, Texas Acting by and Through Its City Public Service Board v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Burlington Northern, Inc., Intervenors. State of Texas v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Burlington Northern, Inc., Intervenors. Burlington Northern, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, City of San Antonio, Texas, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. Indianapolis Power and Light Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McLendon v. Continental Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
  2. State of Texas v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  3. Pendley v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Greyhound Lines, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  5. Public Service Company of Indiana, Inc., Peabody Coal Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Association of American Railroads, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Intervenors. Public Service Company of Indiana, Inc., Peabody Coal Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Association of American Railroads, Seaboard System Railroad, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API