Miers v. Persons
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On final hearing on bill and answers.
1Opinion of the Court
Walker, Chancellor.
The controversy in this case is over the construction of the will of the late Supreme Court Justice Alfred Reed. The question arises upon the fifth item of his will. Omitting the provision for payment of part of the income of his estate to his wife for her life or widowhood, as she predeceased testator, the item reads as follows:
“I bequeath and devise the rest of my prqperty to my son-in-law, Edward D. Miers, and my daughter, Edith Reed Miers, in trust, to sell, convert, invest and reinvest the same, and pay the income therefrom, in payment as nearly quarterly as possible…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Byrne v. ByrneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
- In Re BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1933
- National Newark v. Arthur, C., Blind BabiesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Potter v. WatkinsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- White v. WilleverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1933
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.