Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Collins

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 8, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On this appeal from a conviction for kidnapping, the defendant attacks only the trial judge’s finding (made after a voir dire at which the defendant and a police officer testified) that the defendant had waived his Miranda rights so that his statements, made in reply to police questions, were admissible in evidence. From our examination of the testimony at the voir dire — from which the following summary is drawn — we conclude that the judge’s finding of waiver was correct. The defendant was apprehended .after a chase; he was given the Miranda warnings — then and again at the police station.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. RoyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. MonteririoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HarrisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. CollinsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. PachecoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API