Legal Opinion

Charles v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1914No. Appeal, No. 380PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal, No. 380, Jan. T., 1913, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Luzerne Co., Oct. T., 1909, No. 782, for defendant n. o. v. in case of Angeline Charles v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company. Trespass to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s husband.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 380, Jan. T., 1913, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Luzerne Co., Oct. T., 1909, No. 782, for defendant n. o. v. in case of Angeline Charles v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company. Trespass to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s husband. Before Fuller, P. J. The facts appear in the following opinion of Fuller, P. ■ J. sur defendant’s motion for a new trial, and for judgment n. o. v. This action was brought to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s husband, who was killed by a locomotive while crossing defendant’s west-bound railroad track on Broad street in the City…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam,

This judgment is affirmed on the . concise and clear opinion of the court below entering judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto.

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Zotter v. Lehigh Talley R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Ealy v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Tull v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Rhodes v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Craft v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API