Estate of Waesch
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 382, Jan. T., 1895. by administrator, from decree of O. C., Phila. Co., Oct. T., 1893, No. 327, dismissing exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication. From the adjudication it appeared that decedent died intestate leaving to survive her a husband-, who subsequently took out letters of administration on her .estate, and an illegitimate son of full age who was a resident of- Germany.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 382, Jan. T., 1895. by administrator, from decree of O. C., Phila. Co., Oct. T., 1893, No. 327, dismissing exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication. From the adjudication it appeared that decedent died intestate leaving to survive her a husband-, who subsequently took out letters of administration on her .estate, and an illegitimate son of full age who was a resident of- Germany. At the audit it appeared that the decedent had been a lunatic, and had been ill for some time immediately prior to. her death, and that expenses had been incurred for her maintenance and…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Both of the questions presented by the specifications of error, *207were rightly decided by the orphans’ court. It is unnecessary to add anything to what has been said by the learned president of that court, and we therefore affirm the decree on his opinion.
Decree affirmed, and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellant.
2Cited by33 opinions
- Kanai v. SowaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Swidzinski v. SchultzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Conn's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Cole v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Reynolds v. RiceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.