Legal Opinion

State v. B.J.S.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 7, 2007No. 34529-3-IIPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Houghton, C.J.

B.J.S. appeals his adjudications of residential burglary and second degree theft, both under an accomplice liability theory. He argues that insufficient evidence supported his adjudications and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

¶2 In November 2005, Jason Norris and a friend discussed the idea of “ [t] aking stuff” from Robert Brekke’s *94house while Brekke was away at the beach. Report of Proceedings (RP) at 65. Norris stayed with Brekke for a couple of days before Brekke left for the beach, but Brekke had never given Norris his…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. A.M.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  2. State v. K.H.-H.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. State v. C.B.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. Davison v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. MannCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API