State v. Miksicek
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction. —lion. Wilson A. Taylor, Judge. (1) The first count of the information herein is bottomed upon Sec. 10088, R. S. 1899. This act violates our State and Federal Constitutions; therefore, is void, being repugnant to Art. 2, sec. 4, Constitution of Missouri; art. 2, sec. 30', Constitution of Missouri, and art. 14, sec. 1, Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; State v. Tie and Lumber Co., 181 Mo. 536; Leach v. Tie…
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction. —lion. Wilson A. Taylor, Judge. (1) The first count of the information herein is bottomed upon Sec. 10088, R. S. 1899. This act violates our State and Federal Constitutions; therefore, is void, being repugnant to Art. 2, sec. 4, Constitution of Missouri; art. 2, sec. 30', Constitution of Missouri, and art. 14, sec. 1, Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; State v. Tie and Lumber Co., 181 Mo. 536; Leach v. Tie and Lumber Co., Ill Mo. App. 650; State v. Loomis, 115 Mb. 307; State v. Julow, 129 Mo. 163; State v. Westerfield, 55…
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
The offenses of which the defendant was convicted are misdemeanors; however, the cause was properly sent to this court on the ground that certain constitutional questions are involved, which were properly raised and presented to the trial court.
On January 30, 1908, the assistant prosecuting attorney of the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction, filed in said court his second amended information in this cause. In the first count of said amended information the defendant is charged with the violation of section 10088, Revised Statutes 1899, in that he suffered and permitted certain named…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Muller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Fountain Park Co. v. HenslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
- City of Joplin v. Industrial Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- State v. McGeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- State v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.