Smith v. Gill
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant Gill from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, where the action was tried before Rea, J., without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
This action is for recovery against the defendant, Emily L. Gill, of the value of certain building materials alleged to have been purchased by her, and to have declared and enforced against her property an alleged statutory lien for the same. Upon trial before the court a personal judgment was recovered for the value of the property, but it was found that the alleged lien had not been perfected. It is now urged that the evidence was insufficient to charge this defendant with liability. It appears that the transaction constituting the sale was wholly with the husband of the defendant; that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Phillips v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Abbott v. NashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Patrick v. AbelesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
- More v. RugglesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lundstrom Construction Co. v. DygertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Volker-Scowcroft Lumber Co. v. VanceUtah Supreme Court · 1909
- Klimpel v. HaykoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
- Honstain Bros. v. Linden Investment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
- MacPherson v. CrumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919