Legal Opinion

Stephenson v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 23, 1963No. C.D. 2425Published

1Opinion of the Court

RichaRdsoN, Judge:

The merchandise which is the subject of the instant protest consists of a fur jacket of Danish origin that was imported at Philadelphia and assessed for duty under 19 U.S.C.A., section 1001, paragraph 1519(e) (paragraph 1519(e), Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 51802) at 25 per centum ad valorem as “Articles, wholly or partly manufactured (including fur collars, fur cuffs, and fur trimmings), wholly or in chief value of fur, not specially provided for: Other.” It is claimed in the protest that the fur jacket is entitled to free entry under 19 U.S.C.A., section 1201,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Saurette v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API