State v. Bedrin

WATHEN, Chief Justice.

Defendant David Bedrin appeals from his convictions on two counts of unlawful sexual contact. 1 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255. Bedrin contends that the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Mead, J.) erred in denying his motion for a mistrial based on an inadmissible prejudicial statement by a witness and committed reversible error by striking previously admitted impeachment evidence. He further contends that a question by the prosecutor implied other sexual misconduct and constitutes reversible error. Finding no error, we affirm.

Defendant was charged with three counts of unlawful…