Legal Opinion

In re Lewis

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 6, 1972No. 8555PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Worley, Chief Jvdge.

The issue here is whether the Board of Appeals erred in affirming the examiner’s rejection under 35 USC 103 of claims 1-3 in appellant’s patent application1 for “Cellular Polypropylene.”

*745Tlie claimed invention relates to a cross-linked stereo-regular polypropylene foam having a uniform cell structure with at least 70% of the cells being closed (not interconnected), and having a density of less than 10 lbs./cu. ft. The low density foam can be produced by heating a blend of stereoregular polypropylene, blowing agent and a poly(sulfonazide) cross-linking agent, a method held…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Application of Herman HoeksemaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  2. Application of Floyd E. NaylorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  3. Application of John R. LewisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  4. Application of Helmut Klug and Karl-Heinz MittelbergerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re MillsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  2. In re WillisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API