Legal Opinion
Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 7, 1947PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
The defendants move to strike certain portions of the complaint herein pursuant to Rule 12(f), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. on the ground that they are redundant, immaterial, impertinent or scandalous, and also for a bill of particulars with respect to various facts.
The complaint demands treble damages for injuries allegedly sustained as a result of a conspiracy among the defendants to monopolize and restrain trade in connection with patented oil cracking processes and apparatus in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, IS U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2.
The…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. PeoniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- United States v. PattenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Broadway & Ninety-Sixth Street Realty Co. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Electric Theater Co. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1953
- Greenbie v. NobleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Seaboard Shipping Corp. v. Jocharanne Tugboat Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.