Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. British-American Corp.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided September 22, 1989No. 89-303-CIV-5-BRPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BRITT, Chief Judge.
On 2 August 1989, upon motion of plaintiffs, the court entered an order directing defendants to appear and show cause why certain assets in their control should not be declared fraudulently acquired and why plaintiffs are not entitled to injunctive relief. Defendant British-American Corporation (BAC) has filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and defendant British-American Insurance Company, Ltd. (BAICL) has filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. All matters have been fully briefed and depositions…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Dillon v. Numismatic Funding Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of the Western National Bank of Lovell, Wyoming v. British-American Insurance Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. MaynardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
- General Latex & Chemical Corp. v. Phoenix Medical Technology, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1991
- Barclays Leasing, Inc. v. National Business Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1990
- Uniprop Manufactured Housing Communities Income Fund II v. Home Owners Funding Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1990
- Builder Mart of America, Inc. v. First Union Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.