Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stackhouse v. Holden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1901Published

Appeal by the plaintiff, John G-. Stackhouse, as trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of Otis L. Humphrey and Seward W. Hold-ridge, bankrupts, from that portion of a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk, of the county of Monroe on the 16th day of March, 1901, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Monroe Special Term which adjudges the assignment of certain accounts to be valid..

1Dissent

Spring, J. (dissenting):

Humphrey & Holdridge were copartners dealing in lumber, coal and general produce at Honeoye Falls, in this State. The defendant was a private banker, carrying on a bank at said village under the name of the Bank of Honeoye Falls. The firm did its banking business almost entirely with the defendant, and from 1896 until its failure in the latter part of 1899 its account with the bank was continuously overdrawn. On July 1, 1899, as collateral security for this overdraft, it assigned to the defendant current book accounts amounting to $17,903.36. On October 2, 1899, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. State Trust Co. v. Casino Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  3. Crittenden v. BartonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API