Legal Opinion

Schmid Laboratories v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 20, 1979No. Civ. A. 77-0560PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLARKSON S. FISHER, Chief Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

This is a trademark infringement case involving the competing rights of two major distributors of condoms to use the term “RIBBED” on their respective packages of prophylactics. Plaintiff, Schmid Laboratories Inc. (“Schmid”), and defendant Youngs Drug Products Corporation (“Youngs”), are both New Jersey corporations engaged in the nationwide distribution and sale of condoms. Plaintiff has a registered trademark in the term “SENSI-RIBBED”. 1 It uses this trademark on its “ribbed” 2 type con dom, along with its brand name, “EXCITA”, which it…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  3. Boston Professional Hockey Association, Inc. v. Dallas Cap & Emblem Mfg., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Q-Tips, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  5. Victor Decosta v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Estate of Presley v. RussenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
  2. New Kids on the Block v. News America Publishing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Pharmacia Corp. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
  4. King-Size, Inc. v. Frank's King Size Clothes, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1982
  5. Genovese Drug Stores, Inc. v. TGC Stores, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API