Legal Opinion

Earnest v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 9, 1995No. A94A2832PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge.

A jury found Eugene Earnest guilty of burglary. He appeals from his conviction.

1. Earnest bases his first three enumerations of error upon one premise: there can be no burglary conviction where a person is charged with entering the dwelling house of another and the evidence shows that no one resided in the house at the time of the entry. If the owner resides elsewhere, Earnest argues, the house is not a dwelling within the meaning of OCGA § 16-7-1 and cannot be burglarized. Earnest contends, therefore, that there was a fatal variance between the allegata and the probata, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Hess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. McCloud v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Tibbs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Toth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  2. Sanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Weeks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Paul v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  5. Giles v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API