Sweeney v. Union State Bank
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFeitz, J.
In order to sustain appellants’ claim that Richard J. Sweeney died intestate, it was incumbent upon them to establish by competent evidence that there was a valid and effective revocation of his will of June 15, 1939, the original execution and validity of which was established at the hearing on February 23, 1944, by the uncontroverted evidence introduced and relied upon by the proponents of that will. When then, without any prior notice to them or any proceeding duly instituted for proving or probating any subsequent will, it became evident, in the course of that hearing, that appellants…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The People v. . ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Sperry v. Estate of MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- State v. BighamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Charlesworth v. TinkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
- Morley v. CastorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.