Legal Opinion

Briarcliff Inc. v. Kelley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 11, 1944No. 14883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The first question to be determined is, whether or not the petition as amended was subject to the special demurrer of Briarcliff Inc., the old company, on the grounds of misjoinder of parties plaintiff, of parties defendant, and of causes of action, or multifariousness. If a cause of action was set forth against Briarcliff Inc., based on the contracts issued, and a cause of action also against both Briarcliff Inc. and Briarcliff Laundry Inc., based on a conspiracy to defraud, the petition would be subject to demurrer on each ground urged.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Grant v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. City & Suburban Railway v. BraussSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  3. Wall v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  4. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. SpinksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. White v. North Georgia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Irwin v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Harris v. RoweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  3. Mitchell v. Southern Dairies Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. United Jewelers, Inc. v. Emanuel Burton Diamond Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  5. Carratt v. RitschCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API