Klinger v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The petitioner, Garry Klinger, appeals following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court abused its discretion by concluding that he had not been prejudiced by any claimed ineffective assistance of counsel at his sentencing hearing and by finding that his plea was made knowingly and voluntarily. We dismiss the appeal.
The court found the following facts. The petitioner befriended a woman named Maria Ortiz, obtained information about…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Lozada v. DeedsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Coleman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Klinger v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Klinger v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006