Teague, Barnett & Co. v. Bass
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from tlie Circuit Court of Chambers. Tried before the Hon. N. H. Denson. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The court should have granted the motion for a new trial. — Cobb v. Malone, 92 Ala. 630; Mary Lee C. & R. Co. v. Chambliss, 97 Ala. 180; Shepard v. Doiclonq, 103 Ala. 566; Bir.
Read the full summary
Appeal from tlie Circuit Court of Chambers. Tried before the Hon. N. H. Denson. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The court should have granted the motion for a new trial. — Cobb v. Malone, 92 Ala. 630; Mary Lee C. & R. Co. v. Chambliss, 97 Ala. 180; Shepard v. Doiclonq, 103 Ala. 566; Bir. Elec.-R. Co. v. Clay, 108 Ala. 236; Davis v. Miller, 109 Ala. 600. The facts of the case were sufficient to stamp the purchase by the plaintiff of the stock of goods: as fraudulent. — Cllmau v. Myrick, 93 Ala. 537; Bump on Fraudulent Conveyances, (2d ed.), 133; Wait on Fraudulent…
1Opinion of the CourtDowdell, J.
The appellee Bass instituted -suit "in trespass against appellants for the wrongful taking .of plaintiff’s goods, which were levied upon under an . attachment sued out by appellants against the firm of Satterwhite & Trammell, who were their debtors. The appellee claimed to have purchased the. stock of goods levied upon for value from Satterwhite & Trammell. -Verdict and judgment were rendered in favor of said Bass against appellants, and thereafter a motion was made by appellants for a new trial, principally upon the grounds that the verdict was contrary to the evidence and ‘that the evidence…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Mary Lee Coal & Railway Co. v. ChamblissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Planters' & Merchants' Bank of Mobile v. BorlandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
- Lehman Bros. v. McQueenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Mayer v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1866
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Empire Lighting Fixture Co. v. Practical Lighting Fixture Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Patterson v. MilliganAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
- Montgomery-Moore Manufacturing Co. v. LeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Columbus Electric & Power Co. v. DownsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.