Legal Opinion
State v. Inhabitants of Kearny
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 15, 1892PublishedCited by 10 opinions
On certiorari.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Van Syckel, J.
The complaint of the prosecutors in this -case is that the state school tax and the county tax was unlawfully apportioned. *51The county and state school tax in the county of Hudson is apportioned by a board created for that purpose by the act of April 4th, 1873. Pamph. L., p. 796.
This board takes the place of the board of assessors under the general tax law.
• This board, in August, 1891, determined that the duplicate of the township of Kearny was relatively less than the value of other duplicates in said county, and thereupon added to the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
3Cited by10 opinions
- Olson v. HeisenOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Corn Products Ref. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
- Soos v. SoosNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- Mote v. Incorporated Town of CarlisleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- In re the Appeals filed by the City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Tax Court · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.