Legal Opinion

Tulino v. Tulino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 1, 2017No. 2012-10827PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendants from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Stephen A. Bucaria, J.), entered September 21, 2012. The order denied the motion of Michele Tulino to be indemnified for attorney’s fees incurred in connection with this action.

Ordered that the appeal by the defendant Tulino Realty, Inc., is dismissed, as that party is not aggrieved by the order appealed from (see CPLR 5511; Mixon v TBV, Inc., 76 AD3d 144 [2010]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed on the appeal by the defendant Nicoletta Tulino, as executor of the estate of Michele Tulino; and it is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Biondi v. Beekman Hill House Apartment Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Point Holding, LLC v. CrittendenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Mercado v. COES FX, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Zuckerman v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Landmark Ventures, Inc. v. H5 Technologies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Swanson v. Allstate Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. Federico v. BrancatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  4. Stein v. Davidow, Davidow, Siegel & Stern, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  5. Stein v. DoukasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API