Holstead v. Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
By the WHOLE COURT.
DAWKINS, J.
The Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit has, under the Constitution, certified to us a question of law and asked for instructions. The facts found are substantially as follows:
In the town of Ruston, defendant’s tracks run approximately east and west. At the intersection of one of the main north and south thoroughfares, its freight depot abuts the east line of the street, and extends eastward along one of its tracks, and on the south side thereof, in such a manner as to completely obstruct the view in that direction of those traveling on the street from the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Aymond v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Young v. Louisiana Western R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
3Cited by14 opinions
- McFarland v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Belden v. RobertsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
- Draiss v. PayneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Bergeron v. Greyhound CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
- Robertson v. Missouri Pac. R. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.