Parker v. Sanders
Supreme Court of Arkansas
PETITION for Mandamus. A constitution is framed and adopted in contemplation of, and with reference to the political sub divisions of the state, and “ the law of the land,” as it thus exists. Cooley’s Con. Lim., 1st ed.,*p. 60, 64; ib.,* p. 353,etseq.; James v. Reynolds, 8 Texas, p., 851; Button v. Albertson, 55 LI.
Read the full summary
PETITION for Mandamus. A constitution is framed and adopted in contemplation of, and with reference to the political sub divisions of the state, and “ the law of the land,” as it thus exists. Cooley’s Con. Lim., 1st ed.,*p. 60, 64; ib.,* p. 353,etseq.; James v. Reynolds, 8 Texas, p., 851; Button v. Albertson, 55 LI. Y., p. 54; People v. Porter, 90 N. Y., p. 71. The constitution of 1874 recognized the political division of the state into counties, etc., and established circuit courts in each county, and provided for the holding two terms in each county each year. The makers gave to the…
1Opinion of the CourtBattle, J.
Petitioner, H. A. Parker, states that Hon. M. T. Sanders, judge of the first judicial circuit and of the Monroe circuit court, refuses to and will not hold the circuit ■court of Monroe county on the fourth Monday after the third Monday in February, 1886, unless required to do so by this court, and asks that he be so required by mandamus. Sanders responds to the petition and admits the truth of this allegation.
1. circuit Kxi¿e sf’ On the 13th day of February, 1885, the general assembly ■of this state fixed the time for holding the circuit court of Monroe county on the fourth Mondays after the…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Waterman v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Waite v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Bonner v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Roberts & Scheffer Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.