Legal Opinion

King v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 11, 1927No. 17711PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bkoyles, O. J.

The defendant was convicted of violating the “labor-contract act” (Ga. L. 1903, p. 90; Penal Code, §§ 715, 716). It not having been proved upon the trial that he had no good and sufficient cause for his failure to perform the contract, his conviction was unauthorized. This essential proof was not furnished by the hirer’s testimony that the defendant “had no reason not to work for me so far as I know. . . I did not give him any reason not to come; . . he did not have any reason not to come to work for me, as far as I know.” This testimony amounted to no more than an opinion or…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Durham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Banton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  2. Wood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  3. Garnto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API