Legal Opinion
Cincinnati City v. King
Hamilton County Municipal Court
Decided April 13, 1960No. 17852PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By KEEFE, J.
On November 27, 1959, a jury' found the- defendant guilty of violating Section 901 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Cincinnati. The section is entitled “Indecent Publications,” and provides as follows:
“Whoever shall print, engrave, sell, offer for sale, give away, exhibit or publish, or exhibit as for sale or other purpose, or have in his possession or under his control, any obscene, lewd, lascivious, indecent, or immodest book, pamphlet, paper, picture, image, cast statuary, drawing or representation, or any other article of an indecedent or immoral nature, or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Frost v. Corporation Comm'n of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Davis v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- State ex rel. Michaels v. MorseOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
- Ohio National Bank v. BooneOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. HoytSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970