Legal Opinion

People v. Doane

California Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1888No. 20450PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

The defendant was convicted of the embezzlement of “one sewing-machine,” of the value of seventy dollars, the property of one George W. Welch, and appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

In this case we have examined the entire record (which is in rather a confused condition) several times, and very minutely. At first we were inclined to doubt that there was sufficient evidence to warrant the jury in finding either that defendant embezzled any particular sewing-machine, or that there was an embezzlement of any interest or property of Welch of the value…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API