Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Clem

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1974No. Crim. 12041PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, J.

After a nonjury trial, Billy M. Clem and Walter Mengel appeal from a judgment which fined each of them $50 for each of six counts of selling securities without first qualifying the securities with the Commissioner of Corporations (Corp. Code, §§ 25110, 25540).

Appellants formed three limited partnerships for the purpose of raising money to develop silver mines in Nevada. Without qualifying the securities with the Commissioner of Corporations as required by section 25110 of the Corporations Code, 1 appellants sold interests in the limited partnerships to the public and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. SidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. People v. AcresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Hentzner v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. ShaferNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. State v. AndresenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. People v. FenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API