Jameson v. State

The defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction on the criminal charge of removing encumbered property with intent to defraud. 1a

In testing the sufficiency of the evidence in a criminal trial to the court, findings of the trial court are not to be disturbed on appeal unless they are contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. 2 The test is whether this court can conclude that “. . . the trier of facts could, acting reasonably, be so convinced by evidence it had a right to believe and accept as true.” 3 If more than one inference can…