Legal Opinion

Hall v. Dorsey

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 3, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Statement by

Chief Justice Watson.

This is an action of tort brought under the statute to recover treble damages for cutting down and carrying away certain spruce and fir trees growing on land owned by the plaintiff in the town of Marlboro, this State, without leave of plaintiff. The answer is general denial and special defenses. The trial was by court, under the stipulation on file, more fully given below. The complaint is in two paragraphs, the first of which alleges that defendant on, to wit, the 10th day of November, 1925, with force and arms, broke and entered the plaintiff’s close…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. J. J. Quinlan & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1911
  2. Haskell v. BowenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1872
  3. Priest v. Foster & JaquithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1897
  4. Geer v. 10th School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 1834
  5. Pierce v. MitchellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Firemen's Insurance v. ButcherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API