Legal Opinion

State v. Dillard

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 31, 2013No. 2012AP2044-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.

¶ 1. At the time of Myron C. Dillard's plea in this case, all parties mistakenly believed that due to a "persistent repeater" penalty enhancer, he was facing mandatory life imprisonment at trial. With that understanding, Dillard accepted the State's offer to drop the penalty enhancer as well as a false imprisonment charge (on which the defendant faced a maximum ten-year bifurcated sentence), in exchange for the defendant's "no contest" plea. Dillard *335accepted this offer, on the advice of his attorney, believing that he was reducing his maximum exposure from mandatory imprisonment for the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. MacHnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. BentleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. RiekkoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. CrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Myron C. DillardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. Myron C. DillardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. Myron C. DillardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API