S. E. & H. L. Shepherd Co. v. Shibles
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On report. In the first suit, judgment for plaintiff against defendants, Edward Bryant and Edward B. Kent, and. judgment for the other defendant, John W. Shibles. In the second suit, judgment for the defendants. Two actions based upon precisely the same facts.
Read the full summary
On report. In the first suit, judgment for plaintiff against defendants, Edward Bryant and Edward B. Kent, and. judgment for the other defendant, John W. Shibles. In the second suit, judgment for the defendants. Two actions based upon precisely the same facts. The first is trespass quare clausum wherein the defendants are charged with breaking and entering, with force and arms, the plaintiff’s close situate in Kockport in the County of Knox, and committing certain acts of trespass Jhereon. The second is an action on the cases and charges the defendants with the acts specified in the…
1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.
This case involves two actions both based upon precisely the same state of facts. The first is trespass quare clausum, wherein the defendants are charged in the usual form with entering the plaintiff’s close situated at Rockport, in the county of Knox, and with erecting upon said premises spars and posts for the support of derrick guys and digging up said close and planting anchorages for guys therein, and running guys over and securing them in said close, and thereby greatly encumbering and damaging the same and preventing the plaintiff from having full and free use thereof.
The second is an…
2Cited by5 opinions
- In re Estate of EichhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- C COMPANY v. City of WestbrookSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- Inhabitants of Canton v. Livermore Falls Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1939
- Adams v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Cummings v. MurchisonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940