Legal Opinion

Kussold v. Behrman

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action by vendors to compel specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate.

1Opinion of the CourtKapper, J.

Plaintiffs sue to compel specific performance by the defendants, their vendees named in a contract for the sale of real property. Objections to the marketability of the title were presented upon the trial by the defendants. The following facts appear: One Max Singer died intestate in 1910 seized of an undivided one-half interest in the property. He left as his only heirs-at-law seven infant children. In 1911 a proceeding was instituted in this court for the sale of the said interest of said infants, and their mother, Mollie Singer, was appointed their special guardian. Thereafter and pursuant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haffey v. . LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Rosenberg v. . HaggertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rathe v. Adirondack Concepts, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Kussold v. BehrmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API