Legal Opinion

Sewall v. Lancaster Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1828PublishedCited by 1 opinion

IN ERROR. Writ of error to the District Court of Lancaster county.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Huston, J.

The plaintiff having a judgment against one Andrew Boggs, levied his execution on one hundred shares.of stock in the Lancaster Bank., The fieri faóias came to the hands of the *286sheriff on the 20th of August, 1819. The sheriff sold the stock to the plaintiff oh the 20th of March, 1820.

Andrew Boggs was indebted to the Lancaster bank as follows: oh two notes which had fallen due before the levy, and were not renewed, four hundred and twenty-six dollars'; on two other notes, which notes were dated'before the levy but fell due after the levy, about…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Huntingdon BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1824
  2. Morgan v. Bank of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1822

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bank of Attica v. . Manufacturers' and Traders' BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API