Legal Opinion
Columbus Park Corp. v. Department of Housing Preservation & Development
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 22, 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Wallach, J.
This CPLR article 78 proceeding in the nature of mandamus is brought by a Mitchell-Lama limited-profit housing company organized in 1963, and seeks to compel respondent City of New York and its agency in charge of supervising city-sponsored Mitchell-Lama housing, respondent Department of Housing Preservation and Development, to issue a letter of no objection, an administrative permit necessary to clear the way for petitioner’s dissolution as a Mitchell-Lama company and conversion to a private housing cooperative not subject to the Mitchell-Lama Law (Private…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Barrows v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- City of New York v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Huggins v. Castle Estates Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Columbus Park Corp. v. Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Silverman v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- 2550 Olinville Avenue Inc. v. CrottyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- 40 West 67th Street v. PullmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Bronx Park East Housing Co. v. HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991