Legal Opinion · Dissent

Champlin v. Transport Motor Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1934No. 24785. En BancPublished

1DissentBlake, J.

(dissenting) — March 19, 1932, the plaintiff bought from defendant a Hupmobile. The parties exe cuted a conditional bill of sale containing the following stipulation:

“No warranties, representations or agreements have been made by the seller unless specifically set forth herein.”

The contract recited a cash payment of four hundred dollars (which it is conceded was made as an allowance on an old car traded in), and provided for six monthly payments of forty dollars each. The balance, $783.56, was due and payable November 1, 1932.

Shortly after its execution, the defendant sold its interest in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Hansen v. Stirrat & Goetz Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API