Legal Opinion

Harrold v. Barwise

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 27, 1895No. 1785PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEAD, Associate Justice.

Appellant sued appellee in the Justice Court for the possession of two mules. An appeal from a judgment in his favor was taken to the County Court, and the transcript sent up by the justice showed that appellee’s only plea was a general denial. In the County Court, in addition to the general denial, appellee was allowed to plead specially that he claimed possession of the mules under a mortgage thereof made to him by one Wells.

Appellant, in his .first ■ and second assignments, contends that this special plea should not have been allowed, because it was not interposed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Newton v. NewtonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Blanton & Nunnally v. Langston & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Moore v. HardisonTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. IvyTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Lazarus v. Henrietta National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eason v. DelongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  2. Sparkman v. First State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. McSpadden v. EadsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Slover v. McCormick Harvesting MacHine Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API