Harrold v. Barwise
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HEAD, Associate Justice.
Appellant sued appellee in the Justice Court for the possession of two mules. An appeal from a judgment in his favor was taken to the County Court, and the transcript sent up by the justice showed that appellee’s only plea was a general denial. In the County Court, in addition to the general denial, appellee was allowed to plead specially that he claimed possession of the mules under a mortgage thereof made to him by one Wells.
Appellant, in his .first ■ and second assignments, contends that this special plea should not have been allowed, because it was not interposed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Newton v. NewtonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Blanton & Nunnally v. Langston & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
- Moore v. HardisonTexas Supreme Court · 1853
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. IvyTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Lazarus v. Henrietta National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Eason v. DelongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Sparkman v. First State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- McSpadden v. EadsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Slover v. McCormick Harvesting MacHine Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1961