Legal Opinion

United States v. Rosario Vazquez-Hernandez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 3, 2017No. 15-10009PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SESSIONS, District Judge:

Defendant-appellant Rosario Vazquez-Hernandez appeals his conviction for attempted illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 on the ground that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. Vazquez-Hernandez also notes that the district court’s instruction at trial failed to properly inform the jury of the essential elements of the offense.

The lack of an instruction to the jury that Vazquez-Hernandez had to have a conscious desire to reenter the United States free from official restraint to be found guilty of the crime of attempted illegal reentry was…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. United States v. MarcusSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Oracio Corrales-VazquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Baljinder Singh v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. Volodymyr KvashukCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  4. United States v. Jesus Castillo-MendezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Seraphina CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API