Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Hudson River Ore & Iron Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Columbia county. Action by Thomas F. Morgan against the Hudson River Ore & Iron Company. From a judgment entered on a verdict for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLearned, P. J.

This is an action to recover for injuries alleged to have been received by plaintiff, an employe of the defendant, when engaged in work for it, which injuries it is alleged were caused by the negligence of defendant. Several grounds of alleged negligence are'stated in the complaint. All were withdrawn by plaintiff at the close of the case, except one, viz., that defendant negligently omitted to provide and promulgate rules and regulations for the and of its workmen for their *610tian. We have therefore to consider only this single subject. The defendant has 10 kilns for roasting ore, each about…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Searles v. . Manhattan Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Benzing v. . Steinway and SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Abel v. President, Managers & Co. of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Stringham v. . StewartNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Heavey v. Hudson River Water-Power & Paper Co.New York Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Willard v. HolmesNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  2. Vedder v. LeamonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API