Legal Opinion

Haus v. Barclays American Corp. (In Re Haus)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina

Decided January 6, 1982No. 19-01224PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

J. BRATTON DAVIS, Bankruptcy Judge.

The plaintiffs, Donald L. Haus and Emma P. Haus, filed a complaint to avoid certain liens pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(2)(A) 1 on March 20, 1981. The defendants, Barclays American Corporation (“Barclays”) and Westinghouse Credit Corporation (“Westinghouse”) defend, claiming to be holders of purchase-money security interests not avoidable under § 522(f)(2)(A).

FACTS

On February 9, 1979, the plaintiffs signed a sales contract (“February 9, 1979 sales contract”) for the purchase of a gas range from Cate-McLaurin Company, Inc.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Manuel v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Matter of JonesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1980
  3. Ronald J. Sommers v. International Business MacHines and West Publishing Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Mulcahy v. Indianapolis Morris Plan Corp. (In Re Mulcahy)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana · 1980
  5. Booker v. Commercial Credit Corp. (In Re Booker)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Snap-On Tools Corp. v. Freeman (In Re Freeman)District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1991
  2. In Re K & P Logging, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2001
  3. In Re Coleman Pipe, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1984
  4. Bank of America, N.A. v. Case Credit Corp. (In re K & P Logging, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API