Legal Opinion

Sprint Corp. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided April 30, 1997No. Docket No. 13159-94Published

P, a telephone company, purchased certain telecommunications equipment, digital switches, that required computer software to operate. P claimed investment tax credits (ITC) and depreciation deductions under the accelerated cost recovery system (ACRS) with respect to the total cost of each digital switch, which included the cost of the software used in each switch.

Read the full summary

P, a telephone company, purchased certain telecommunications equipment, digital switches, that required computer software to operate. P claimed investment tax credits (ITC) and depreciation deductions under the accelerated cost recovery system (ACRS) with respect to the total cost of each digital switch, which included the cost of the software used in each switch. R determined that P's expenditures allocable to the software did not qualify for the ITC or depreciation under the ACRS. P treated property known as "drop and block" as 5-year property, as defined in sec. 168(c) (2) (B), I.R.C. R…

1Opinion of the Court

SPRINT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES, F.K.A. UNITED TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Sprint Corp. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 13159-94

United States Tax Court

108 T.C. 384; 1997 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 17; 108 T.C. No. 19;

April 30, 1997, Filed

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

P, a telephone company, purchased certain telecommunications equipment, digital switches, that required computer software to operate. P claimed investment tax credits (ITC) and depreciation deductions under the accelerated cost recovery system (ACRS) with respect to the…

Also in this document: Dissent · Colvin; Dissent · Korner.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. LudeySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Grodt & McKay Realty, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  3. Massey Motors, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Commissioner v. Idaho Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. ScovilSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API