Legal Opinion

Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 9, 2015No. 12-902CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Motion in limine, Spent Nuclear Fuel, Offset Costs, Incurred Costs, Res Judicata

OPINION AND ORDER

EDWARD J. DAMICH, Senior Judge

Before the Court is a Motion in limine filed by Plaintiff Dairyland Power Cooperative (“Dairyland”). Dairyland seeks an order pursuant to Rule 7 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) prohibiting Defendant, the United States, from arguing that Dairyland must deduct from its pending damages claim the nonbreach world cost of delivering spent fuel to the United States Department of Energy (“DOE”) in 1998 or earlier. Dairyland further seeks, pursuant to RCFC…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  3. Ammex, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  4. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  5. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Silver State Solar Power South, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API