Legal Opinion
Lee E. HASSIG, Appellant, v. Ray W. PEARSON, Jr. and A. T. Pearson, Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 11, 1977No. 76-1537PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
This is an action brought under section 10(b), Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) (1970), and Rule 10b-5, and involves the sale of bank stock by the plaintiff to one of the defendants, an officer in the bank. Plaintiff Lee Hassig alleged that defendants A. T. Pearson and Ray W. Pearson, Jr., violated their duties to him in the purchase, and sought to recover as damages the profit which the purchaser, Ray Pearson, made by reselling the stock. The case was tried to the court which found it had jurisdiction, but that there was no violation of Rule 10b-5.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,773 Financial Industrial Fund, Inc., a Maryland Corporation v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Joe Harold Williams v. Lloyd Eaton, as Football Coach of the University of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Harnett v. Ryan Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
3Cited by13 opinions
- Employees' Retirement System v. Williams CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Michaels v. MichaelsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- C.E. CARLSON, INC. and Charles E. Carlson, Petitioners, v. SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Comeau v. RuppDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
- Drobbin v. Nicolet Instrument Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.