Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Gay

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1880PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Grundy Circuit Court. — Hon. G. D. Burgess, J udge.

1Opinion of the CourtHough, J.

This was an action aghinst Nathan Gillilan and Samuel Gay as makers, and Robert L. Gillilan as indorser, of the following instrument in writing :

$650. Trenton, Mo., May 18, 1874.

Ninety days after date we promise to pay to the order *628of Robert L. Gillilan $650, for value received, with interest after maturity at the rate of ten per cent per annum, at the First National Bank of Trenton, Mo., and if not paid at maturity, and the same is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection, we agree and promise to pay ah additional sum of ten per cent as an attorney’s fee.

Nathan Gillilan.

Samuel Gay.

Th…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. GaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. Samstag v. ConleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1877

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. South Bend Iron Works v. PaddockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. Mechanics'-American Nat. Bank v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  3. Oppenheimer v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Broadbent v. BrumbackIdaho Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Creasy v. GrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API