Legal Opinion

Cox v. Crossley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 20, 1938No. 28080PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The estate of Sensley, an incompetent, was being managed by guardianship in the county court of Oklahoma county. The defendants in error, merchants, sold and furnished groceries, clothing, and other merchandise to the ward for use of the ward and his dependents, a wife and seven children. They filed claim against the estate for the unpaid balance of $575.54 in the county court. That court by citation directed the guardian to appear and defend against the claim. He appeared and answered by general denial, and also alleged that he had fully provided for the ward and his dependents- by paying…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. PilgreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Crossley v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of ChubbeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API