Legal Opinion

Eldon v. Perrin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 8, 2012No. 4D11-2329PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant challenges the validity of a temporary injunction granted by the trial court. We reverse the order granting the temporary injunction because the order is facially deficient in failing to contain sufficient factual findings to support each prong of the four-part injunction test and in failing set an appropriate bond.

Before a temporary injunction may be granted, the trial court must make “clear, definite, and unequivocally sufficient factual findings” showing that: (1) the movant will suffer irreparable harm unless the status quo is maintained; (2) the movant has no adequate remedy at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Snibbe v. Napoleonic Soc. of America, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Thomas v. EnglishDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Jouvence Center for Advanced Health, LLC v. Jouvence Rejuvenation Centers, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Learning Systems, Inc. v. GomesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. RONALD N. DUBNER v. FRANK FERRARODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. TESORO PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION, INC. v. TEROSO COMMONS, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  4. CWI-GG RCFL PROPERTY OWNER, LLC. v. DAVID J. STERN and CASTILLO GRAND RESIDENCES CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
  5. ELIZABETH U. BALDWIN and MANOR AT VERO BEACH, LLC v. PAUL R. WILLET, IndividuallyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API