Legal Opinion

Siegle v. Helmuth

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2009No. 09-0083Published

1Opinion of the Court

2009 MT 447N

DAVID SIEGLE, and SIEGLE, INC., Plaintiffs, Appellees, and Cross-Appellants,

v.

SANFORD K. HELMUTH, a/k/a SANDY HELMUTH, Defendant and Appellant.

No. DA 09-0083.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Submitted on Briefs: November 12, 2009.

Decided: December 29, 2009.

For Appellant: Albert R. Batterman, Batterman Law Offices, Baker, Montana.

For Appellees: Richard O. Harkins, Attorney at Law, Ekalaka, Montana.

Justice JOHN WARNER delivered the Opinion of the Court.

¶ 1 Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court 1996 Internal Operating Rules, as amended in 2006, the following decision…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United National Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Faulconbridge v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Pipinich v. BattershellMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Weimar v. LyonsMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. C. Haydon Ltd. v. Montana Mining Properties, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API